The Benefits Contract Review Prompt Pack | Altiqe Consulting
Free prompt pack · v2

The Benefits Contract Review Prompt Pack

Five prompts that turn your AI tool into a benefits contract reader working for you, not the vendor.

Most of the money in your health plan is decided in contracts you have never read: PBM agreements, stop loss policies, administrative service agreements, and the paperwork that pays your broker. This pack gives you the questions to ask each one.

5 promptsOne for every contract in your plan
Plain EnglishNo benefits degree required
Your analystReviews on your side, not the vendor's

Why this exists

The people who wrote those contracts are counting on you not reading them.

You do not need a benefits degree to read them anymore. You need the right questions. That is what this pack is.

How to use it

Five steps from signed contract to real answers

1

Get the fully executed contract. Not the summary, not the proposal — the signed agreement with every exhibit and amendment. When you do not have it, ask your broker or vendor for it in writing. They owe it to you.

2

Strip the private data first. Remove employee names, Social Security numbers, dates of birth, and any health information before you paste anything into an AI tool. The contract terms are what you want reviewed, not your census.

3

Open your AI tool of choice.

4

Copy the matching prompt, paste it, and attach or paste the contract. For a long contract, attach the file or paste it in parts, and make sure every exhibit and amendment is included. When an exhibit is missing, tell the AI so it flags the gap instead of guessing.

5

Read what comes back, then bring the flags to a conversation. One caution: AI is a strong first read, not a legal opinion. Use it to find the questions worth asking. Then get a human who works for you, not the vendor, to confirm what you found.

How every prompt works

Standing rules, so the AI works for you and does not invent anything

It reviews as your analyst, not the vendor's, and explains everything in plain English.

It quotes only language that actually appears. When a provision is not there, it says so and flags the absence as a finding.

It calculates real dollars when you give it a premium, rate, or fee.

It answers in a fixed shape: a short executive summary first, then a table, then a list of what is missing, then the questions to ask.

Inside the pack

Five prompts, one for every contract behind your plan

Choose the contract you want to review, expand the prompt, then copy, paste, and attach your document.

1

PBM agreement (your pharmacy plan)

Checks your pharmacy contract for hidden pricing tricks, rebate carve-outs, and rebate-driven drug placement.

Have ready: the PBM contract, all pricing exhibits, the rebate schedule, and any definitions section.

View full prompt
Copy and paste this into your AI tool Then attach or paste the matching contract.
You are a pharmacy benefits analyst working for the employer that sponsors this plan, not for the PBM. Explain everything in plain English for a CEO with no benefits background.

Rules:
- Quote only language that actually appears. When a provision is not in the document, say "not found in the provided document" and flag it as a gap. Never infer a term exists.
- Absence is a finding. Missing protections matter as much as bad ones.
- When I give you pricing or claim volumes, calculate the dollar impact. Otherwise, name the data you would need.
- Rank findings by cost and risk, not by order in the contract.

Review the attached PBM agreement and check each item, quoting the exact language:

1. Pricing model. Is this spread pricing or transparent pass-through, and where does the contract let the PBM keep the difference between what it charges the plan and what it pays the pharmacy?
2. Guarantees. What are the AWP discount and generic effective rate (GER) guarantees, and are they measured in aggregate across all drugs (which hides overcharges on individual drugs) or per claim?
3. Rebates. How is a rebate defined, what percentage flows to the plan, and what carve-outs let other manufacturer money (admin fees, grants, data payments) escape the rebate definition and stay with the PBM?
4. Definitions that move money. How are AWP, brand, generic, and specialty defined, and can the PBM reclassify a drug in a way that raises the plan's cost?
5. Formulary control. Who controls the formulary, and is drug placement driven by the highest rebate rather than the lowest net cost to the plan?
6. Fees. List every administrative, dispensing, per-claim, clinical, and network fee.
7. Specialty and mail order. Is the plan required to use the PBM's own pharmacies, and what is the markup there?
8. Audit and reconciliation. Can the employer audit claims and rebates, how often and at whose cost, and is there an annual reconciliation that pays the plan back when the guarantees are missed?
9. Term, termination, and data ownership. Can the employer leave without penalty, and does the employer own its own claims data?

Then output in this order:
1. A three-bullet executive summary, the biggest money or risk issues first.
2. A table: Provision | What it says (quoted) | Plain-English meaning | Risk (high, medium, low) | Question to ask.
3. A "What is missing" list, the protections that should be here and are not.
4. The exact questions I should ask the PBM before signing.
Top red flags

spread pricing dressed up as discount guarantees, aggregate-only guarantees, rebate definitions with carve-outs, formulary placement driven by rebates, and no annual reconciliation.

2

Stop loss policy (catastrophic coverage)

Compares your stop loss policy to your plan document and flags renewal traps and coverage gaps.

Have ready: the stop loss policy, the schedule of specific and aggregate terms, the plan document, and any laser or amendment pages.

View full prompt
Copy and paste this into your AI tool Then attach or paste the matching contract.
You are a stop loss analyst working for the employer, not the carrier. Explain everything in plain English for a CEO.

Rules:
- Quote only language that actually appears. When a provision is not in the document, say "not found in the provided document" and flag it as a gap. Never infer a term exists.
- Absence is a finding. A missing protection can cost more than a bad clause.
- When I give you deductibles or premium, calculate the dollar exposure. Otherwise, name the data you would need.
- Rank findings by cost and risk, not by order in the contract.

Review the attached stop loss policy and check each item, quoting the exact language:

1. Specific and aggregate deductibles. State both, and explain how the aggregate attachment point is calculated.
2. Gap between the policy and the plan document. This is the biggest risk. Flag any claim the plan document would pay that the stop loss policy excludes, because the employer eats that gap. Note whether "no gap" or "plan mirroring" language exists.
3. Lasers. Are any individuals lasered (given a higher deductible)? List them and the amounts.
4. Contract basis. Is this 12/12, 12/15, 24/12, paid, or incurred, and what does that mean for claims near the start and end of the year?
5. Run-in and run-out. How are claims incurred before or paid after the contract period handled?
6. Renewal protections. Is there a no-new-laser provision, a rate cap, or an aggregating specific? When none exists, say so plainly.
7. Notification and filing deadlines that could cause a valid claim to be denied.
8. Eligibility gotchas. Actively-at-work rules or eligibility definitions that could exclude a large claim.
9. Disclosure and commission. Any ongoing large claimants the carrier disclosed, and any broker commission or override built into the premium.

Then output in this order:
1. A three-bullet executive summary, the biggest exposure first.
2. A table: Provision | What it says (quoted) | Plain-English meaning | Risk (high, medium, low) | Question to ask.
3. A "What is missing" list.
4. The exact questions I should ask before signing.
Top red flags

any gap between the policy and the plan document, new lasers allowed at renewal, tight filing deadlines, a contract basis that leaves a gap at termination, and no rate cap in a hardening market.

3

TPA / ASO agreement (your plan administrator)

Reviews the contract for whoever runs your self-funded plan, catching uncapped fees and limited audit rights.

Have ready: the administrative services agreement, the fee schedule, and any network or repricing exhibits.

View full prompt
Copy and paste this into your AI tool Then attach or paste the matching contract.
You are an analyst working for the employer that sponsors this self-funded plan, not for the administrator. Explain everything in plain English for a CEO.

Rules:
- Quote only language that actually appears. When a provision is not in the document, say "not found in the provided document" and flag it as a gap. Never infer a term exists.
- Absence is a finding.
- When I give you fees or claim volumes, calculate the dollar impact. Otherwise, name the data you would need.
- Rank findings by cost and risk, not by order in the contract.

Review the attached administrative services agreement and check each item, quoting the exact language:

1. All fees. List the per-employee-per-month admin fee and every pass-through fee: network access, repricing, shared-savings percentages, clinical programs, and any others.
2. Out-of-network repricing. What cut does the administrator or a repricing vendor take on reduced out-of-network claims? This shared-savings fee is one of the largest hidden costs in self-funding, so quantify it if the percentage is stated.
3. Hidden revenue. Interest or float earned on the employer's claim funds, and any vendor override arrangements.
4. Fiduciary status. Does the administrator accept or disclaim fiduciary responsibility, and how much discretionary authority does it hold over claims?
5. Data and claims access. Does the employer get full, timely, usable claims data, on what cadence, and who owns it?
6. Audit rights. Can the employer audit paid claims, and are there limits that block a real audit?
7. Performance guarantees. Are there any, and are the penalties real dollars the employer can actually collect?
8. Termination and run-out. Can the employer leave, on what notice, what run-out fees apply, and what happens to claims run-out and data?

Then output in this order:
1. A three-bullet executive summary, the biggest cost or control issue first.
2. A table: Provision | What it says (quoted) | Plain-English meaning | Risk (high, medium, low) | Question to ask.
3. A "What is missing" list.
4. The exact questions I should ask.
Top red flags

an uncapped shared-savings cut on repriced claims, claims data withheld or charged for, audit rights limited to a sample, and the administrator disclaiming fiduciary duty while keeping full discretion.

4

Carrier contract (fully-insured plans)

Reviews your insurance carrier contract for hidden margin, buried commissions, and missing renewal caps.

Have ready: the group policy or master contract, the rate exhibit, and any renewal or participation terms.

View full prompt
Copy and paste this into your AI tool Then attach or paste the matching contract.
You are an analyst working for the employer, not the insurance carrier. Explain everything in plain English for a CEO.

Rules:
- Quote only language that actually appears. When a provision is not in the document, say "not found in the provided document" and flag it as a gap. Never infer a term exists.
- Absence is a finding.
- When I give you the premium or rates, calculate the dollar figures. Otherwise, name the data you would need.
- Rank findings by cost and risk, not by order in the contract.

Review the attached fully-insured group contract and check each item, quoting the exact language:

1. Rate guarantee and renewal terms. How long are current rates guaranteed, and is there any cap on the renewal increase?
2. Retention and margin. What is the carrier's built-in profit and administrative load, and is it disclosed anywhere in the contract? When it is not, say so plainly, because that hidden margin is a cost the employer cannot see.
3. Commission built into premium. Does the contract or rate disclosure show broker commission inside the premium? State the amount or percentage when shown.
4. Participation and eligibility requirements. What levels must the employer maintain, and what happens if it slips?
5. Experience and refunds. Is the employer eligible for an experience refund, dividend, or medical loss ratio (MLR) rebate, and how is that calculated?
6. Claims data rights. Can the employer get its own claims experience, or is it blocked from seeing what it is paying for?
7. Termination and grace. Notice and grace terms, and what triggers cancellation.

Then output in this order:
1. A three-bullet executive summary, starting with what this contract hides or prevents the employer from seeing.
2. A table: Provision | What it says (quoted) | Plain-English meaning | Risk (high, medium, low) | Question to ask.
3. A "What is missing" list, including whether the employer's size would support looking at a level-funded or self-funded alternative.
4. The exact questions I should ask.
Top red flags

no renewal rate cap, retention and margin nowhere disclosed, claims experience the employer cannot see, commission buried in the premium, and participation rules that trap the group.

5

Broker or consultant agreement

Reviews how your broker gets paid and flags vague disclosures and fees that rise as your costs rise.

Have ready: the broker or consultant service agreement, the compensation disclosure (the CAA disclosure), the carrier commission schedule if you have it, and your plan's most recent Form 5500 if one is filed.

View full prompt
Copy and paste this into your AI tool Then attach or paste the matching contract.
You are an analyst working for the employer, not the broker. Explain everything in plain English for a CEO.

Rules:
- Quote only language that actually appears. When a provision is not in the document, say "not found in the provided document" and flag it as a gap. Never infer a term exists.
- Absence is a finding.
- Calculate real dollars where the document lets you, and be explicit about what cannot be calculated from the document alone.
- Rank findings by cost and risk, not by order in the contract.

Review the attached broker or consultant service and compensation agreement and check each item, quoting the exact language:

1. Total compensation, all sources. Commission, bonuses, overrides, contingent or supplemental compensation, and any payments from the vendors underneath the plan (PBM, stop loss, TPA). Does the agreement disclose all of it, direct and indirect, as the Consolidated Appropriations Act requires for compensation of $1,000 or more?
2. Compensation basis, and the dollar figure. Is the broker paid a flat fee, or a percentage that rises when the employer's premium or claims rise? When I paste the premium or the rate, calculate the direct commission in dollars and explain the incentive that basis creates.
3. What cannot be calculated here. Contingent and supplemental compensation is paid at the brokerage's total-book level, not per plan, so it cannot be carved out from this contract. Flag it as disclose-and-estimate only, and tell me to pull three sources to verify the rest: the CAA disclosure, the carrier commission schedule, and Form 5500 Schedule A (which reports the actual commissions and fees the carrier paid the broker, by name, for plans that file).
4. Conflicts of interest. Does the broker own, or get paid by, any of the vendors it recommends?
5. Scope of services. What is the broker actually obligated to do for this pay, and what is billed as extra?
6. Termination. Can the employer remove the broker without penalty, and who controls the plan data and vendor relationships if it does?

Then output in this order:
1. A three-bullet executive summary: total disclosed compensation, whether it is fully disclosed as the law requires, and the biggest conflict.
2. A table: Provision | What it says (quoted) | Plain-English meaning | Risk (high, medium, low) | Question to ask.
3. A "What is missing" list, including any compensation source that should be disclosed and is not.
4. The exact questions I should ask before renewing the relationship.
Top red flags

a vague "we may earn other income that does not affect your cost" line in place of real numbers, percentage-based pay that rises with your costs, contingent comp left undisclosed, payments from the vendors the broker recommends, and penalties for leaving.

A note on the math: The contract gives you the basis, rarely the full number. You can calculate direct commission once you have the rate. Everything else, contingent and supplemental comp, overrides, and payments from the vendors underneath the plan, is often undisclosed and not fully knowable, even after you ask. Form 5500 Schedule A shows what the carrier reported paying the broker, so it is a useful cross-check for plans large enough to file, but it does not capture every dollar and smaller plans do not file it. Assume a real part of the pay is hidden by design. That gap is not a rounding error. It is the finding.

What to do with what you find

The reaction tells you almost as much as the answer

You will likely find questions you cannot answer from the contract alone. That is the point.

A good advisor welcomes the questions and answers in plain numbers.

GET THE PACK

Enter your details below to download the Benefits Contract Review Prompt Pack.

GET THE PACK

Enter your details below to download the Benefits Contract Review Prompt Pack.